

In 2026, teams are expected to do more than cope with disruption.
In 2026, teams are expected to do more than cope with disruption. They must respond to new technology, shifting customer expectations, economic uncertainty, restructures and changing ways of working, often at the same time.
This raises an important question for L&D and HR leaders:
Should your organisation prioritise resilience or adaptability?
The answer is both. However, they support people in different ways.
Resilience helps people recover from pressure, setbacks and adversity. Adaptability helps people adjust, learn and move forward when circumstances change.
Resilience helps your team get back on its feet. Adaptability helps your team decide where to go next.
For organisations preparing for continuous change, adaptability is becoming the more forward-looking capability. It prepares people not only to withstand change, but to participate in it, shape it and thrive through it.
Resilience is the ability to cope with difficulty, recover from setbacks and maintain effective functioning under pressure.
A resilient employee may be able to:
Resilience does not mean that someone never feels stress, uncertainty or frustration. It means they have the resources and support to respond constructively rather than becoming overwhelmed.
At team level, resilience can be seen in how quickly a group recovers after a failed project, difficult restructuring or unexpected disruption. Resilient teams often have strong relationships, shared purpose and established ways to reflect and learn after adversity.
However, resilience can still leave an important question unanswered:
What should we do differently now?
Adaptability is the ability to adjust your thinking, behaviour, priorities and actions in response to new conditions.
An adaptable employee may be able to:
Adaptability is not simply being agreeable or accepting every change without question. It involves making thoughtful adjustments while staying connected to a clear purpose.
An adaptable team does not just recover from disruption. It uses new information to improve how work is done.
This is why adaptability is increasingly important in leadership development, soft skills training and change management. Organisations need people who can respond well to what is happening today while also preparing for what may happen next.

The distinction becomes clearer when we compare the focus, timing and outcomes of each capability.
ResilienceAdaptabilityPrimary focusRecovering from adversityAdjusting to new conditionsMain question“How do we get through this?”“What needs to change now?”Core skillsEmotional regulation, persistence and copingCognitive flexibility, learning and experimentationTime orientationResponding to pressure or setbacksPreparing for and responding to what is nextTeam outcomeRecovery, stability and sustained performanceAgility, innovation and effective changeTypical development needStress management and supportLearning, flexibility and behavioural change
Neither capability is better in every situation.
If your team has experienced sustained pressure, resilience may need immediate attention. If your organisation is entering a transformation, resilience will help people cope, but adaptability will help them adopt new systems, behaviours and priorities.
Resilience should be a priority when your people are experiencing high levels of pressure or repeated setbacks.
Look for signs such as:
In these situations, a resilience programme may include:
Resilience development should never be used to place responsibility for excessive pressure entirely on employees. If workloads, leadership behaviours or organisational systems are creating unsustainable conditions, those issues must also be addressed.
Resilience is strongest when individual capability is supported by a healthy working environment.
Adaptability becomes especially important when the organisation is facing ongoing or unpredictable change.
Your team may have an adaptability gap if:
In these situations, traditional soft skills training focused only on confidence or resilience may not be enough. People also need opportunities to practise:
Adaptability is not developed through a single presentation. It grows through repeated practice, reflection and feedback.
Resilience and adaptability are closely connected.
A resilient person may have the emotional stability to remain engaged during uncertainty. An adaptable person may have the flexibility to change their approach as new information appears. Together, these capabilities support more effective performance through change.
Consider a major digital transformation:
Without resilience, constant change can become exhausting. Without adaptability, teams may remain strong but continue repeating outdated behaviours.
The goal is not to choose between resilience and adaptability. The goal is to build both, with a growing emphasis on adaptability as organisations prepare for an increasingly uncertain future.
A practical development programme can include the following steps.
Begin by explaining the difference between resilience and adaptability. When teams understand that these are distinct but connected capabilities, development conversations become more specific.
Instead of saying, “We need to be more resilient,” leaders can ask:
People are more likely to adapt when they can raise concerns, ask questions and discuss mistakes without fear of blame.
Leaders can support this by:
Psychological safety supports both resilience and adaptability because it gives people the confidence to recover, learn and try again.
Use realistic scenarios, simulations and team exercises. Ask participants to respond to changing priorities, incomplete information or unexpected obstacles.
After each exercise, discuss:
These conversations turn soft skills training into observable workplace behaviours.
After-action reviews, project retrospectives and regular coaching conversations help teams convert experience into learning.
A simple review can ask:
Reflection strengthens resilience by helping people process setbacks. It strengthens adaptability by helping them identify better responses for the future.
Engagement surveys and performance data can provide useful context, but they do not always show how prepared people are for change.
A targeted talent assessment can help identify strengths and development needs across an individual or team. It can reveal whether the main opportunity lies in resilience, learning, confidence, flexibility, support or another factor influencing adaptability.
AQai’s Adaptability Quotient (AQ) assessment provides a science-based way to understand how people respond to change.
The AQme assessment is designed to help individuals discover their adaptability strengths and development opportunities. It provides a personalised profile across 15 dimensions, including areas such as:
The assessment is based on academic and organisational research across more than 100 scientific publications. Results are delivered through an individual dashboard with actionable insights and a downloadable report.
For teams, AQai also offers team adaptability assessment options, including individual and team insight reports. This can help L&D and HR leaders move beyond general assumptions and identify where development investment is most needed.

Resilience and adaptability are not competing priorities.
Your team needs resilience to recover from pressure. Your team needs adaptability to respond effectively to what is changing.
Resilience protects performance during difficult periods. Adaptability prepares people to learn, adjust and thrive in the next environment.
For L&D and HR leaders, the most effective approach is to:
If you want to understand your team’s readiness for change, explore the AQai AQ assessment platform. You can also learn more about AQai’s AQ model or book a discovery call to discuss how adaptability assessment and development could support your people strategy.
Teams need both resilience and adaptability. But adaptability is the capability that prepares them for what comes next.